QUESTIONS? CALL: 830.360.1920

Technology

Why Custom MCP Servers Are Becoming a Core Part of Modern AI Architecture

As AI systems move from experimentation into real production workflows, organizations need a secure, governed way to connect models to company systems and data. That’s where MCP servers are quickly becoming essential.

Custom MCP Servers

Summary

  • 1MCP servers provide connectivity and control for how AI systems use and interact with your company data.
  • 2A custom-built MCP server improves security, governance, and reliability by enforcing your policies at the point of AI access.
  • 3Low-code / no-code MCPs are best for prototyping—they can fall short for scalability, security, and mission-critical workloads.
  • 4Serious AI adoption requires treating MCP infrastructure as software, not just something to configure.


What MCP Servers Do (and Why They Matter)

MCP servers provide tools that allow modern AI systems to connect to resources beyond what they’ve been provided in a single model context.
That might be your accounting system, your CRM, or a custom internal platform.

Why “just use existing APIs” often breaks down

  1. APIs often return too much. They’re designed for applications, not for context-limited AI tool use, so they may return bulk data
    instead of only what the AI needs for the current task.
  2. APIs don’t always provide the right control model. Some are all-or-nothing, others are constrained by the connected user,
    and many lack granular guardrails.
  3. APIs can limit visibility. It’s often hard to see exactly what was requested, what was returned, and what the AI did next.

With an MCP server, you can provide exactly what’s needed for the specific interaction—no extra content to confuse the AI,
and no unnecessary functionality that expands your risk surface. You can also track, audit, and adjust tool behavior based on
predefined rules the AI can’t override.

MCP and Security Posture

You’ve likely seen the headlines: “We told AI not to delete the database… but it did it anyway.”
MCP can be the secure entrance into your data and network—but not all MCP servers are created equal.

Common pitfalls with hosted or generic MCP servers

  • Over-broad permissions
  • Hardcoded credentials
  • Lack of auditability
  • Limited isolation between tools or data sources

Custom MCP servers let you apply your security principles to AI interactions—identity, access boundaries,
auditing, and policy enforcement—without relying on generic assumptions.

Low-Code / No-Code MCPs: When They’re Useful and Where They Fall Short

When to use low-code / no-code MCPs

  • Experimentation and internal testing
  • Prototyping workflows
  • Validating a use case before engineering investment

Where they fall short

  • Coarse-grained permissions
  • Limited support for custom authentication flows
  • Limited visibility into parts of the process
  • Weak audit and compliance capability
  • Hard to version, test, and govern

Low-code MCPs optimize for speed and reduced engineering effort—not for control.
That tradeoff is fine during exploration, but it becomes a liability in production.

Production MCP Servers Require Real Code

Why code matters in production

  • Security policies are logic, not just GUI configuration
  • Real error handling and retries that surface actionable failures
  • Domain-specific validation and guardrails (what “safe” means depends on your business)
  • Testability (unit, integration, security testing)
  • CI/CD, version control, and rollback support like the rest of your platform

Don’t cut corners: if MCP is part of your production AI stack, it should meet the same standards as the rest of your software platform.

Choosing the Right MCP Strategy for Your Organization

Use these questions to pressure-test whether you need a custom MCP server:

If the answer to any of the above is yes, building a custom MCP server is typically the better long-term choice.

Looking Ahead: MCP as a Long-Term Control Plane for AI

MCP servers are evolving into a three-part bastion for modern AI:

1) Policy enforcement

Control what AI can access and what actions it can perform—at the boundary where it matters.

2) Governance and visibility

Centralize audit trails, usage patterns, and operational accountability across AI tools.

3) Shared enterprise structure

Create a consistent integration pattern for teams building AI capabilities across the organization.

Organizations that invest early in custom MCP servers can achieve a stronger security posture, faster iteration with AI,
and lower long-term risk.

Building AI responsibly requires more than prompts and plugins.

If you’re moving beyond experimentation and into real-world AI systems, your MCP strategy matters.
Let’s talk about designing an MCP architecture that scales securely—from prototype to production.

Schedule a meeting with a developer

Read more
No Comments

When Zapier Stops Scaling: 7 Signs It’s Time to “Own Your Automation” (and a Safe Migration Playbook)

When Zapier Stops Scaling: 7 Signs It’s Time to “Own Your Automation” (and a Safe Migration Playbook)

Imagine this. A request comes through to tweak a field in your CRM to a different data type. A member of the IT team makes the change and confirms it is working as intended. Within two hours, there are 12 alerts in Zapier that no-code workflows are failing. The blame game begins. While some of the zaps take a few minutes to fix, there is one that has to be completely re-designed, and one that should be working, but just isn’t.

While this exact scenario is fictitious, I’ve seen similar situations play out—situations where there are flows that people would like to change but don’t touch because each time someone does, it breaks for hours or days.

This may sound like I’m disparaging no-code and low-code workflows, but they have a very good place: initial automation, prototyping, non-critical workflows, and multi-step processes.

Seven Signs It’s Time to Convert a Workflow to Owned Code

  • Volume is high, and costs and completions have become unpredictable.
  • The workflow is mission-critical (you lose significant revenue when it isn’t functioning).
  • Tool sprawl (e.g., Zapier + Make + Sheets + internal scripts).
  • Debugging and updates are difficult—or rely on a single person.
  • You need clarity behind the workflows (logs, metrics, better alerts).
  • Security and compliance concerns have become major issues (where is this data at all times? what is the cleanup time on temporary data?).
  • You care about intellectual property and business value (valuation and M&A readiness). Asset vs. liability.

Start With Confirmation of How Much You’re Spending on Workflows

What to measure:

  • Number of automations
  • Average number of failures per month
  • Average time to repair
  • Time spent fixing workflows each month

Although estimating the cost of converting workflows is difficult without specific details, expect an initial upfront expense followed by ongoing hosting fees. If you’re already spending over $100 per month on workflows, plan to save at least 80% annually after the conversion.

The key questions are the cost of developing the new code, how valuable the new code is as an asset versus a dependency, and whether there is capital available for the initial investment.

Migration Playbook

1) Inventory Your Automations

  • List workflows, triggers, connected systems, data moved, and owners.

2) Define the System of Record for Each Domain

  • Identify the single source of truth for each domain (customers, billing, payroll, projects, etc.).
  • Note: multi-master bi-directional workflows are possible but problematic.

3) Convert the Highest-Impact Workflow First

  • Pick one that is high-volume, high-friction, and high-risk.

4) Build It as a Small Service With Guardrails

  • Validation rules
  • Idempotency (duplication, replays)
  • Retries
  • Rate-limit handling

5) Run in Parallel for a Safe Cutover

  • Compare outputs
  • Check edge cases
  • Switch half of traffic—or all of traffic—when confident

6) Add Observability and Ownership

  • Logs, metrics, alerts, and documentation for handoff

The Results

  • Predictable cost
  • Fewer failures + faster debugging
  • Better security posture
  • Easier onboarding for new team members
  • Automation becomes an asset—not a subscription

Practical Examples

Need help? Contact us for an automation audit.

Share 2–3 workflow examples with us, and we can help you understand the potential ROI from conversion.

Schedule with an engineer today

Read more
No Comments

What Is a Fractional CIO or CTO — and Why Your Business Might Need One

The Role of A Fractional CIO/CTO

What Is a Fractional CIO or CTO — and Why Your Business Might Need One

As organizations grow, technology decisions become more complex, higher-risk, and more tightly connected to business outcomes.
A fractional technology leader can bring executive-level guidance without the overhead of a full-time hire.

Many companies reach a stage where they need senior technology leadership—without needing or justifying a full-time executive role.
That’s where a fractional CIO (Chief Information Officer) or fractional CTO (Chief Technology Officer) comes in.

What “Fractional” Means

A fractional CIO or CTO provides experienced, executive-level technology leadership on a flexible, part-time basis.
This model gives organizations access to strategic oversight, planning, and decision support—scaled to their actual needs.

At Open InfoTech Solutions, fractional leadership is intentionally flexible. Whether you need a few hours per week,
periodic support for planning and budgeting, or deeper involvement during a major initiative, the engagement adapts to your business.

Why Not Rely Solely on Your Managed Service Provider (MSP)?

Even the strongest MSPs are typically reactive by nature—responding to requests, incidents, and defined scopes of work.
When they present options, leaders are often left with a critical question:
How do we objectively evaluate these choices in the context of our business goals?

How a Fractional CIO/CTO Helps

  • Provide business-aligned technology guidance
  • Evaluate vendor recommendations with an independent lens
  • Reduce risk by improving decision clarity and accountability
  • Act as an executive counterpart to MSPs, vendors, and internal teams

Unlike vendors who may benefit from specific tools or partnerships, a fractional executive is focused on
what is best for your organization—technically, financially, and operationally.

When a Fractional CIO or CTO Makes Sense

Organizations often seek fractional leadership during moments of change or complexity, such as:

Your IT team is keeping systems operational, but strategic initiatives, scalability planning, and future-state architecture are difficult to prioritize.

The executive team has defined objectives but lacks confidence in evaluating vendors, platforms, or architectural approaches.

You’ve lost a key IT leader and need experienced guidance to stabilize operations and chart a path forward.

Your MSP may be performing well—or struggling—but you need assurance their recommendations and priorities align with your business strategy.

In each of these scenarios, a fractional CIO or CTO brings clarity, structure, and executive-level accountability—without the cost or commitment of a full-time hire.

The Value of Fractional Leadership

Fractional CIOs and CTOs are not a replacement for your internal team or service providers. They add a strategic layer—
connecting business goals to technology execution, reducing risk, and helping leadership teams make informed decisions with confidence.

The difference is moving from reacting to technology challenges to using technology as a competitive advantage.

Next step

Want to explore a fractional engagement?
Schedule a conversation with an expert

Tags: Fractional CIO, Fractional CTO, IT Strategy, Technology Leadership, MSP Oversight

Read more
No Comments
TOP